On Contradiction × On Practice complete method distillation
Maoxuan
Product Agent
Turn a complex product problem into one decision worth executing.
A Chinese-first AI product manager and product decision Agent Skill for prioritization, growth, operations, data, delivery, and cross-team collaboration. The source method stays backstage; every answer uses modern product language.
- 36
- work scenarios
- 36/36
- self-tests passed
- 12
- public cases
- MIT
- open-source license
Example decision
A higher click-through rate is not yet a business win
The skill does not average ten plausible tactics. It identifies what the current evidence proves, what it does not prove, and which decision should come next.
“Our A/B test increased clicks by 12%, but orders did not increase. Should we roll it out?”
Reasoning engine
It distills decision moves, not quotations
The engine was designed after complete readings of On Practice, On Contradiction, and related Volume I essays. Default output contains no source quotation, history lesson, political framing, or character role-play.
- 01FactsSeparate evidence, behavior, feedback, and assumptions
- 02BottleneckFind the current problem that most constrains the result
- 03MechanismDetermine which force or rule is driving the outcome
- 04ActionChoose the smallest useful and reversible move
- 05UpdateRevise the judgment from real-world results
Start from observable reality
User behavior · business data · frontline evidenceFind the current primary problem
Core bottleneck · critical path · resource trade-offReturn the judgment to practice
MVP · staged rollout · A/B test · data reviewWhy it is different
Make the trade-off before giving advice
36 recurring scenarios
From roadmap conflict to metric anomalies and delivery risk
The knowledge system is organized around the work product leaders actually face, not around chapters from the source texts.
Product & planning
Requirements prioritization
Version planning
Roadmaps
MVP and staged rollout
Enterprise requests
Strategy shifts
Growth & operations
Growth stagnation
Acquisition and channels
Retention and conversion
Community cold start
Content supply
Campaign performance
Data & monetization
DAU and MAU
Metric anomalies
Data definitions
A/B tests
CAC, LTV, and ROI
Pricing and membership
Delivery & organization
Executive interruptions
Resource constraints
Project delays
Cross-team collaboration
OKRs and KPIs
Retrospectives
Install
One command for Codex, Claude Code, and Cursor
Standard Agent Skills package. No server, API key, paid dependency, or runtime dependency.
Install the skill globally in all three supported agents.
npx skills add atdy/maoxuan-product-agent --skill product-decision-agent --agent codex claude-code cursor -g -y
No Node.js or Git? Download the standalone v1.0.3 Skill package. After installation, describe a real product problem or invoke $product-decision-agent or /product-decision-agent explicitly. The skill answers in Simplified Chinese by default.
FAQ
What to know before using it
Is Maoxuan Product Agent a political or historical skill?
No. It is a product decision skill. Unless source tracing is explicitly requested, its answers contain no political role-play, historical explanation, theory lesson, or source quotation.
Do users need to read On Practice or On Contradiction first?
No. Users only provide the real product, growth, operations, data, delivery, or collaboration problem. The source method remains in the background.
Why does the skill answer in Simplified Chinese?
It is designed for day-to-day internet product work in mainland China. Standard product terms such as DAU, GMV, CAC, LTV, ROI, MVP, A/B Test, OKR, KPI, and Roadmap remain in English where useful.
Which AI agents are supported?
The standard Skill package supports Codex, Claude Code, Cursor, and other tools compatible with the Agent Skills directory format.
Has the skill been tested?
Yes. The repository publishes a 36-scenario evaluation matrix, representative outputs, deliberate failure cases, four clean-session forward tests, and automated quality gates.
Can it replace user research, data validation, or product accountability?
No. It clarifies decisions, next actions, and validation signals, but it does not invent missing evidence or replace research, data checks, legal judgment, or final business accountability.
Next step